Hi Anastasia,
We are trying to match our groups on motion and can't match them if our scans 
have the floor values. We are not sure how to determine what the threshold 
value should be in order to make the dropout score no longer floor out. Any 
suggestions on how to better match on motion?
Thanks,
Colleen

From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Yendiki, Anastasia
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 6:46 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] dmri_motion -T threshold

Hi Colleen - Do the DWIs of your subjects have any slices that are in the brain 
but look very dark, almost like the background? That's what those measures 
capture, and not all subjects have that. If your subjects don't have that, then 
there's nothing to be concerned about!

Best,

a.y
________________________________
From: 
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
 [freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] on behalf of Buckless, Colleen 
[buckl...@kennedykrieger.org]
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 3:35 PM
To: 'freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu'
Subject: [Freesurfer] dmri_motion -T threshold
Hi All,
I've been using dmri_motion to quantify motion in our DTI data.  We are 
uncertain how to determine what the -T threshold should be. We have read 
through the wiki and the related papers and are confused what this number 
represents, how it effects the output, and the rational for selecting a 
specific threshold value. We have tried the default (100) and almost all of our 
scans have the floor values (0 and 1) for percent bad slices and average 
dropout score, and we are concerned that this value is most likely 
inappropriate for our data. We have tried other values but are unsure what a 
suitable threshold value should be for our data.  We are concerned that this 
number effects the output, and want to make sure we are using an appropriate 
value.  What is the best way to select the -T threshold and the rational for 
selecting one value versus another?
Thanks,
Colleen Buckless
Research Assistant
Center for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging Research
Kennedy Krieger Institute
443-923-2747
buckl...@kennedykrieger.org<mailto:buckl...@kennedykrieger.org>

________________________________
Disclaimer:


The materials in this e-mail are private and may contain Protected Information. 
Please note that e-mail communication is not encrypted by default. You have the 
right to request further emails be encrypted by notifying the sender. Your 
continued use of e-mail constitutes your acknowledgment of these 
confidentiality and security limitations. If you are not the intended 
recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this 
information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, 
please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail.
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to