Hi James, I would not run upsampled data through the highres pipeline. (not even sure I would run highres data through that).
So you should sample to 1mm resolution. To be fair you should also resample the 1mm image to a new position (to also introduce interpolation artefacts there). You could use my make_upright script for that, which uses mri_robust_register to map the image to an upright and straight head position. Best, Martin > On 20. Jul 2018, at 22:15, James Gullickson <jgull...@umn.edu> wrote: > > External Email - Use Caution > > > All, > > I would like to compare cortical thickness between two timepoints. > > Timepoint 1 has 1mm^3 data. > Timepoint 2 has 0.8mm^3 data. > > I realize that there are limitations with this change in resolution between > timepoints and that no analysis is going to be perfect, but I am trying to > come up with the best possible solution. > > Would it work to resample both timepoints' raw data into 0.9mm^3 ( > mri_convert --conform_size 0.9 invol outvol ), and then run the 0.9mm data > through Freesurfer 6.0 submilimeter recon? If so, are there any special > considerations I need to take into account after the initial recon, or would > longitudinal processing after this point be per normal? > > Thanks, > > James > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
