did you look at the entorhinal label in the aparc to see if it is reasonable? Then check the white and pial surfaces in that region. Sounds like something went wrong there

cheers
Bruce


On Fri, 22 Mar 2019, Lance wrote:


        External Email - Use Caution        

Hi there,
    I want to calculate the significance of grayvol between two groups, but the 
data i noticed in
the 'lh.aparc.stats' file shew some problem.The pic below shows the grayvol of 
entorhinal of some
subjects,but one of them appears to be 136,far more lower than the others, 
what's the problem? is it
a normal systematic error or is there something wrong with my operation while 
calculating? The same
situation is also found in CurvInd and FoldInd.
[IMAGE]

Thank you for your help!

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to