External Email - Use Caution        

Bruce,

Thanks so much for the quick response! I don't know how to load the defect 
labels. When I try to load them as a surface, I get an error. I'm doing this in 
freeview gui. Also, I checked the cerebellum and it's not attached.

Thanks,
Brendan

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bruce Fischl
Sent: Friday, August 9, 2019 10:27 AM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] CORRECTING DEFECT

CAUTION: External

Hi Brendan

the time to correct goes with the square of the size of the defect (actually 
the convex hull of the defect) so it can take a very long time for big ones. 
More importantly, if the defect is that large it may not be corrected in the 
anatomically desired manner. You should take a look at it and see what is 
causing it. Is skull left over? Cerebellum attached?
Hemispheres connected? Usually the big ones are due to something dramatic.
Look at the ?h.orig.nofix and the ?h.inflated.nofix. YOu can load the 
?h.defect_labels on top of the surfaces and brain.mgz and the wm.mgz to see 
which one is 29 (note that they defect_labels file is probably 1-based so you 
would need to look for 30 in it).

If you can't sort it out gzip and tar your subject and put it on our ftp site 
and we will take a look for you cheers Bruce

On Fri, 9 Aug 2019, Balken, Brendan wrote:

>
>         External Email - Use Caution
>
> Hello!
>
>
>
> So I am attempting to use freesurfer’s recon-all script but for one of 
> our subjects I keep getting stuck at this point: “CORRECTING DEFECT 29 
> (vertices=19321, convex hull=4029, v0=32423) XL defect detected...” It 
> has already corrected 28 defects, but they were much smaller. It has 
> been running for about 48 hours on a very powerful machine and I’m 
> wondering how long I should wait. Will it eventually move on? If no, 
> what is my contingency plan for processing this? I’m using the output 
> anatomy folder in brainstorm for source analysis. Any guidance or 
> information would be greatly appreciated.
>
>
>
> Thanks a million!
>
> Brendan
>
>
>
>
>
> Here’s what the lh and rh.inflated.nofix look like (is that the defect?):
>
>
>
> [IMAGE]
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to