External Email - Use Caution        

       We recently moved to FreeSurfer 7.1.1 running it on ~ 100 different 
types of cases using the -3T options, but after a case failure, we looked 
deeper into the v7.x changes related to bias correction, and it seems that 
using the -3T option did not produce a different bias corrected outcome than 
using the default for any cases (see description below). IF this is truly the 
case, our workaround would be to continue using the MNI N3 approach options we 
had before (e.g., an expert option file with the line: mri_nu_correct.mni 
--no-ants-n4), since that improved the correction in our data previously, but 
would like to make sure we are interpreting the v7 approach correctly. Thoughts 
on this appreciated, many thanks:

  *   In earlier FreeSurfer versions, we used the options based on the Zheng 
paper with N3 as recommended for 3T data. So with our switch to v7.1.1 which is 
now using ANTs N4, we looked into the 3T options with the flags described on 
the wiki, and used those flags in our runs accordingly.
  *   However, once we had this case failure (which had worked in a prior FS 
version run with the N3 3T flags), we dug into things and did some test runs. 
We found that in Freesurfer v7.1.1 when using ANTs N4 (i.e., 
AntsN4BiasFieldCorrectionFs) [instead of MNI N3 (i.e., nu_correct)], the effect 
of specifying the recon-all  -3T (or -nuintensitycor-3T) option did not change 
the outcome relative to the default bias correction:
     *   In v7.1.1, it seems that when ANTs N4 is used for bias field 
correction, the same bias field correction is performed whether the -3T (or 
-nuintensitycor-3T) option is specified or not.  We assessed this by creating 
nu.mgz difference images (between runs with and without the -3T option) and 
confirmed by reviewing logs and the mri_nu_correct.mni script.
     *   When the ANTs N4 bias field correction is used with the -3T options, 
the parameters for stronger bias field correction (i.e., "--n 1 --proto-iters 
1000 --distance 50") are passed to mri_nu_correct.mni, but then seem to be 
dropped by mri_nu_correct.mni and not included in the subsequent call to 
AntsN4BiasFieldCorrectionFs.
     *   Below  are the relevant lines extracted from a mri_nu_correct.mni.log 
when stronger bias field correction was specified via the -3T (or 
-nuintensitycor-3T) option to recon-all but the parameters do not seem to be 
used by ANTs:

mri_nu_correct.mni.log:
...
/usr/local/freesurfer/bin/mri_nu_correct.mni
--no-rescale --i orig.mgz --o orig_nu.mgz --ants-n4 --n 1 --proto-iters 1000 
--distance 50
nIters 1
mri_nu_correct.mni 7.1.1
...
AntsN4BiasFieldCorrectionFs -i orig.mgz -o 
/dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.2116356/nu0.mgz
Using shrink factor: 4
...



--
Christine Fennema-Notestine, Ph.D.

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to