Ok, thank you! Would the command to add the label to glmfit then be --label file.label or --label fsaverage/label/file.label? I found different suggestions in the mail_archives, with some explicitly specifying the fsaverage-path and some not.
Is it possible to then run permutations as per the FS permutation tutorial with the output from above (after including the --eres-save flag in the mri_glmfit command)? Kind regards, Carl On 12/12/2022 6:14 PM, Trolle, Carl wrote: > Thank you for the reply, > > 1. Once each participant's aparc has been broken and we've created > the desired new label for each participant, should we create this, > the desired label, for fsaverage and follow the remaining steps of > the ROI-tutorial (e.g resample with mris_label2label using > fsaverage as the srcsubject)? Sorry didn't quite understand this part. > Nope, once you have the ROI you want in the native subject space, just use it, no need to go to fsaverage at all. That was only for if you were going to draw your own label. Instead of drawing it on 10s or 100s of subjects you would draw it once on fsaverage then transfer it to all your subjects. But you don't need to do that. > > 1. > > > > ??? 3. We can't seem to get mris_register and mri_ca_label working > with FS711 or 720, it's running fine with 732 and the dev-version > (attaching a simple montage to show the output we're getting; we've > tried to force FreeSurfer to use a manually designated central sulcus > to move the pre and post central gyri "forward"). I think there was a > mention that mris_register wasn't running as intended prior to 732 > <https://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg73308.html>.? > Thank you for the clarification! Unfortunately, I don't remember what I was referring to. As far as I know mris_register and mri_ca_label were working normally pre 732. > > Kind regards, > > Carl > > > > Message: 7 > Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 10:34:15 -0500 > From: "Douglas N. Greve" > <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>> > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Creating and analyzing combined ROIs, > ??????? combining different FreeSurfer versions > To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > Message-ID: > <8e7e390b-bbef-00cd-29c6-bda799bfd...@mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:8e7e390b-bbef-00cd-29c6-bda799bfd...@mgh.harvard.edu>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > On 12/2/2022 12:35 PM, Trolle, Carl wrote: > > Dear FreeSurfer team, > > > >? 1. We're trying to focus our cortical analysis following suggestions > >???? here > > > https://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg23939.html.?The > <https://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg23939.html.?The> > >???? FS ROI tutorial page?mentions that labels should be drawn or > >???? registered on the fsaverage template; could we then break the > >???? fsaverage aparc_annot atlas and combine the fsaverage labels of > >???? interest into our new label or should we break each individual > >???? subjects aparc_annot atlas and then create the combined ROI from > >???? the subject specific labels? I'm assuming that we either way will > >???? have to resample the combined label to each subject using > >???? mri_label2label? > > > You should break each subject aparc and then combine. > > > > 1. > > > > > >? 2. When running the mri_glmfit-sim analysis later on, the thread > >???? above mentions not using the --cache option. Can we use "--mczsim > >???? 3 pos" instead for a one-sided test? > > > Yes > > > >? 3. We've had some success in correcting incorrect parcellations using > >???? the mris_register and mri_ca_label functions. As we had some > >???? issues with mris_register in 7.1.1, we used the developer version > >???? for these steps, but 7.1.1 when re-running recon-all as this is > >???? the version we used for our study. Is it ok to combine versions > >???? like this? > > > probably ok in this case, but what is the problem? > > > > 3. > > > > > > Thank you for your time! > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Carl Trolle > > Research fellow > > Spaulding Neuroimaging Lab > > > > > > Platform:?linux-centos7_x86_64-7.1.1-20200723-8b40551 > > FreeSurfer version: 7.1.1 > > > >
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham Compliance HelpLine at https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline <https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline> . Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted). If you do not wish to continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of this message immediately. Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail.
