I’m in the process of testing the patch, and I have some troubles with FXS now.

 

When bridging a call onto an FXS channel, the bridge fails. What seem to happen 
is the lock acquired in ftmod_analog.c line 83 is not released (seems it is 
not) before ftdm_analog_channel_run calls ftdm_channel_open_chan which in turn 
tries to acquire and fails the same lock.

 

If I add a 500ms delay (ftdm_sleep) at the entrance of ftdm_analog_channel_run, 
the problem disappears.

There seem to be a race condition here, but as I have no idea how threads are 
scheduled (nor within mod_freetdm neither in overall freeswitch) this is beyond 
my skills. However (I get the same kind of scheduling problems when trying to 
thread the MWI function) I’d be glad to learn how that works, so if you have 
any pointers…

 

François

 

 

De : freeswitch-dev-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org 
[mailto:freeswitch-dev-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] De la part de Moises Silva
Envoyé : jeudi 3 juin 2010 23:35
À : freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org
Objet : Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FXS bridged on FXO ports and DTMF

 

Something is f'd up there badly. I cannot reproduce this in my A200.

Can you give me more details of how are you wiring things up?

Also do "git pull", I just improved the DTMF logging to aid in in debugging. 
Reproduce the problem and pastebin the resulting logs.

Regarding your MWI patch. I added some comments on JIRA.

Moises Silva
Senior Software Engineer
Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R 9T3 
Canada
t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e. m...@sangoma.com



On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 6:46 AM, François Legal <de...@thom.fr.eu.org> wrote:

So now using latest git and wanpipe is even worse compared to snapshot from 
last week. freetdm now also detects and queue the DTMF from the dialed number.

The new patch is available.

On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 16:26:49 -0400, Moises Silva <moises.si...@gmail.com> wrote:

I'm going to test this DTMF scenario now and let you know.

In the meantime, would it be much to ask a patch that I can apply using git 
apply?? The patch still fails to apply using git, I see you are still using 
svn, try git plz.

The code looks good though :-)

Moises Silva
Senior Software Engineer
Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R 9T3 
Canada
t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e. m...@sangoma.com



On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 4:19 PM, <de...@thom.fr.eu.org> wrote:

I just updated to 3.5.11 and the result is the same.

 

De : freeswitch-dev-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org 
[mailto:freeswitch-dev-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] De la part de Moises Silva
Envoyé : mercredi 2 juin 2010 21:35
À : freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org
Objet : Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FXS bridged on FXO ports and DTMF

 

I believe the problem was that the driver enabled even outgoing DTMF detection 
on the chip  ( which does not make much sense by default since you only care 
about incoming ) and was fixed a few months ago

Do you still see this behavior? which driver version?

Moises Silva
Senior Software Engineer
Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R 9T3 
Canada
t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e. m...@sangoma.com

On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:22 PM, <de...@thom.fr.eu.org> wrote:

I come back on this topic as I did not find a clean/good solution to this 
problem.

 

As reminder, the problem occurs when an FXS channel is bridged on an FXO 
channel (seen with sangoma A400 hardware with HW DTMF detection).

The problem is that each leg of the bridge is detecting the inband DTMF, and so 
freeswitch sends each detected DTMF from one leg to the other, and so on and so 
forth (as each leg detects the DTMF again and again).

 

I guess what would be needed for these cases is some application that would 
prevent detected DTMF to be sent to the other leg.

 

Can anybody give me a hint on whether or not such application exists, and if 
not, a starting point to try to create one.

 

Thanks

 

François

 


_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list
FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
http://www.freeswitch.org

 


_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list
FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
http://www.freeswitch.org

 


_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list
FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
http://www.freeswitch.org

 

_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list
FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
http://www.freeswitch.org

Reply via email to