My goal is obviously not to provide carrier grade VOIP switch service, but a platform for sandbox testing of configurations, SOHO VOIP Switches, development of FS addons, backup switch capability, etc. Doing this stuff at home behind NAT and a consumer grade router is one reason Brian, Anthony, Mike, et al. are half crazy. I run my company's phone switch in a 32 bit OpenVZ VE with 256 Mb ram, and have no issues. When I goof around trying to transcode between 8 and 16 bit codecs and whatnot, sure it gets tight, but FS on an idle system keeps 23 mb of of ram resident, and rarely if ever hits a 256 mb bean counter (limit).
Also, these limits are not hard, I just know what my hardware has, and am trying to offer as much value as I can for what I have in the systems. 128 Gb of ECC ram and Quad/Quad Core zeons are still pretty pricey! Nik On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Brian West <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually you can if you don't overload the machine like most VPS > providers do... The advantage with OpenVZ in this case is that you can > migrate the running FreeSWITCH instance between hardware nodes and not > drop calls at this size. > > /b > > On Feb 11, 2009, at 6:24 PM, EdPimentl wrote: > >> Soho,,, yes of course... >> Voip (soho)Service Provider.... not convinced is possible to provide >> reliable QoS. >> My .02 cents >> -E > > > _______________________________________________ > Freeswitch-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > _______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
