Where do you guys read that it's in alpha?
On the opensips.org they proclaim OpenSips 1.5 released,
with that module being one of the new features. I don't see any
mention of it being alpha/beta functionality?
Best regards,
Even André
On 4. april. 2009, at 00.30, Pablo Hernan Saro wrote:
Hi Kristian, you're right. Definitively that will be best solution
as soon as it's released as stable (it's alpha now).
http://www.opensips.org/index.php?n=Resources.DocsTutLoadbalancing
Pablo
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Kristian Kielhofner <[email protected]
> wrote:
You could try (although it's somewhat bleeding edge) to use OpenSIPS
1.5 with load_balancer (not heavily tested, btw) in front of some
FreeSWITCH machines:
http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/devel/load_balancer.html
2009/4/2 Ashley van Gerven <[email protected]>:
> Hi,
>
> I can't find much info on setting up a redundant or heavy load
FreeSwitch
> implementation. Are there any
> links apart from: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Enterprise_deployment
?
>
> I imagine the entry level solution is to have two FS boxes
configured
> identitcally, with
> redundant SBC software (recommendations?) in front, passing the
calls to the
> primary FS box,
> or the backup FS box if the primary is not responding. Is that the
easiest
> solution?
>
> What about a situation of having a level of concurrent calls
beyond what one
> FS box can handle? I realise
> that would be a very large number of concurrent calls, but we
would need a
> good plan on how to scale the
> systems.
>
> Are there recommendations for load balancing solutions? Either
soft or
> hardware?
>
> My guess would be having 3 + 1 spare FS servers would work, where
calls are
> distributed accross 3 FS boxes
> by a load balancer with one spare in event of failure.
>
> Also how would a FS box at max capacity behave? Does FS monitor
available
> resources and reject the
> excess calls that it can't handle? Or would the load balancer have
to be
> configured with the maximum number
> of calls per box?
>
> Would love to hear some experiences of deploying FS with failover
& high
> load.
>
>
> Thanks
> Ash
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
--
Kristian Kielhofner
http://blog.krisk.org
http://www.submityoursip.com
http://www.astlinux.org
http://www.star2star.com
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
