Not opensips but the module is in alpha. In the modules doc page says "alpha/new".
Pablo On 4/3/09, Even André Fiskvik <[email protected]> wrote: > Where do you guys read that it's in alpha? > On the opensips.org they proclaim OpenSips 1.5 released, > with that module being one of the new features. I don't see any > mention of it being alpha/beta functionality? > > Best regards, > Even André > > On 4. april. 2009, at 00.30, Pablo Hernan Saro wrote: > >> Hi Kristian, you're right. Definitively that will be best solution >> as soon as it's released as stable (it's alpha now). >> http://www.opensips.org/index.php?n=Resources.DocsTutLoadbalancing >> >> Pablo >> >> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Kristian Kielhofner >> <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> You could try (although it's somewhat bleeding edge) to use OpenSIPS >> 1.5 with load_balancer (not heavily tested, btw) in front of some >> FreeSWITCH machines: >> >> http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/devel/load_balancer.html >> >> 2009/4/2 Ashley van Gerven <[email protected]>: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I can't find much info on setting up a redundant or heavy load >> FreeSwitch >> > implementation. Are there any >> > links apart from: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Enterprise_deployment >> ? >> > >> > I imagine the entry level solution is to have two FS boxes >> configured >> > identitcally, with >> > redundant SBC software (recommendations?) in front, passing the >> calls to the >> > primary FS box, >> > or the backup FS box if the primary is not responding. Is that the >> easiest >> > solution? >> > >> > What about a situation of having a level of concurrent calls >> beyond what one >> > FS box can handle? I realise >> > that would be a very large number of concurrent calls, but we >> would need a >> > good plan on how to scale the >> > systems. >> > >> > Are there recommendations for load balancing solutions? Either >> soft or >> > hardware? >> > >> > My guess would be having 3 + 1 spare FS servers would work, where >> calls are >> > distributed accross 3 FS boxes >> > by a load balancer with one spare in event of failure. >> > >> > Also how would a FS box at max capacity behave? Does FS monitor >> available >> > resources and reject the >> > excess calls that it can't handle? Or would the load balancer have >> to be >> > configured with the maximum number >> > of calls per box? >> > >> > Would love to hear some experiences of deploying FS with failover >> & high >> > load. >> > >> > >> > Thanks >> > Ash >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Freeswitch-users mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> > http://www.freeswitch.org >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Kristian Kielhofner >> http://blog.krisk.org >> http://www.submityoursip.com >> http://www.astlinux.org >> http://www.star2star.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Freeswitch-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Freeswitch-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com _______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
