Yes I need to (re) implement a 1400 bps version of Codec 2. I'll do something about that over the next few days.
Cheers, David On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 11:00 +0100, Peter wrote: > On 7 May 2012 02:17, David Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: > > Next step is to tweak Codec 2 to make it interface cleanly to the modem > > for some initial on-air tests. > > Ah damn, this is what I missed. Hence why I had problems demodulating > the test transmission I created. I'll be sending out some test signals > of my own once it's ready and working. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Freetel-codec2 mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Freetel-codec2 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
