Ideally, I would like to see the same CODEC rates used between HF and
VHF/UHF. That would enable future applications linking between bands.
-Brian/KY9K
On Oct 23, 2012 12:37 PM, "John D. Hays" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On the subject of data rate, I would consider target usage.
>
> E.g. 1400/1200 for HF where bandwidth is at a premium and more prone to
> fade. With different "standard" FEC levels depending on link quality.
>
> 2400 for VHF and above where bandwidth is less of an issue, but again a
> link quality based FEC is desirable. Even better to make it auto adaptable.
>
> ------------------------------
> John D. Hays
> K7VE
> PO Box 1223, Edmonds, WA 98020-1223
> <http://k7ve.org/blog> <http://twitter.com/#!/john_hays>
> <http://www.facebook.com/john.d.hays>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
> _______________________________________________
> Freetel-codec2 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
