David, Richard,
I have wondered whether the routines in the sox components could be
duplicated in some way. This is not my area, but I certainly know of other
source(s) of the biquad filter. I'm not qualified to judge whether these
implementations are suitable replacements, but I can dig up references if
desired.
Dave Witten, KD0EAG
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 06:26:52 +0930
From: David Rowe <[email protected]>
Subject: [Freetel-codec2] sox files and lib
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <1369256212.3184.122.camel@bear>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I recommend we include the sox source files we need in our source
repository. Relying on the system sox lib whose internal implementation
will vary over time and different machines is too risky.
I'm uneasy with the assumption the latest version of sox installed in
the system will be OK. Although maybe I'm wrong. At a minimum pls make
sure tools-filter is tested on several systems if the system lib is
used. It's not sufficient to have it just build OK. I've had reports of
this feature crashing on some Linux/Mac systems (although this cld be
some other bug of course)
I use just a few internal sox functions for the tools-filter feature.
Stuff like biquad filters. At some stage it would be nice for some one
to work out exactly which sox source files we need.
Cheers,
David
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service
that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
