They claim "near toll quality" at 2400 Baud without the FEC, 3600 with.
We claim toll quality at half that rate. From a short look, it appears
you have to buy their chip. We accomodate having the algorithm in your
main processor as long as you give us some means to reflash it.
Thanks
Bruce
On 08/20/2013 08:12 AM, Gullik Webjörn wrote:
> I do not really want to swear inthe church, but here goes:
>
> Has anyone compared codec2 vs. RALCWI?
>
> I understand RALCWI is a waveform codec rather than a "human voice"
> modelling, but do you have any subjective views on this?
>
> The emerging dpmr standard seems to have AMBE+2 and RALCWI as supported
> codecs, plus "The chineese codec (not decided yet)", and a forth option for
> yet another codec specified by manufacturer. I see codec2 here. :-)
>
> SM6FBD
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and
> AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights,
> analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management.
> Visit us today!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Freetel-codec2 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and
AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights,
analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management.
Visit us today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
