On March 2, 2014 12:48:33 PM PST, Ham Radio Java <[email protected]> wrote:
>You can see I might have stopped after the first two subbands, because with >just a 150 Hz low-power jammer I can destroy your communications. Isn't this entirely discounting the effect of the FEC? Also, do we really have raw codec bits on those first few carriers, or is most of the first frame a convolutional coded version of those bits? It does not look right that FEC and data are shown separately. My impression was that Voicing, Fundamental Frequency, Energy, etc. were assembled into a bit field which then had golay coding applied to it, and then most of the first frame would be the golay code output. If this is not the case, why not? Thanks Bruce -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Freetel-codec2 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
