Hi David,
Having a low barrier to entry will make it more likely that users will
stick with the program long enough to learn more about it. So, if the
program could start out with a wider frequency estimation range, that would
probably be best. If there is any reason to reduce that range, the user can
do that once they have learned what the waveform should look like.
Thanks
Bruce
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 4:09 PM, David Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> People have been tuning SSB by ear for years. I suspect we will get
> used to the sound of the 700-ish waveforms (in analog mode) and be able
> to get close enough by ear so the demod clicks in.
>
> If not, no biggie to make the freq off estimation range wider.
>
> - David
>
> On 22/09/15 08:09, Stuart Longland wrote:
> > On 15/09/15 18:42, David Rowe wrote:
> >> The CPU load is proportional to the initial freq offset estimation
> >> bandwidth. I'm inclined to wait a little and see if this is a real
> problem.
> >
> > Tuning accuracy is likely to be an issue on headless systems or for
> > visually impaired operators.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freetel-codec2 mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Freetel-codec2 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
