Seems like there are still limits on the FPGA side if it's desired to use
OSS toolchains for it. For instance, SymbiFlow is missing Xilinx DSP
support per https://symbiflow.github.io/. Do we foresee that to be an issue?

Anyway, personally, I'd go with 128MB RAM/64-128MB flash to enable future
expansion, but I also haven't quoted pricing recently. FPGA offload would
potentially reduce requirements, too.

(BTW, I imagine actually building on the target would be rare. Cross
compiling on a desktop or laptop PC will always be significantly faster,
even taking transfer time into account.)

-Mooneer K6AQ

On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 4:27 PM glen english <g...@cortexrf.com.au> wrote:

> I am designing an SM3000, and now is the time for input from users.
> (input request below)
>
> *****
> Design Goals :
>
> High computational capability : So that our modems and codecs as they
> become more advanced, are less constrained by the STM32F4 platform.
>
> Platform to be Linux so that development, updates, debugging is very
> similar to the PC platform.
>
> To be low cost - so that the cost is not a barrier to entry. Not all of
> us live in wealthy western  countries.
>
> To be able to run advanced wideband modems and advanced speech codecs
> like LPCnet-Codec2.
>
> To have platform capability (but maybe not on the PCB) to provide
> advanced connectivity - to be able to provide features without having to
> learn new platforms.
>
> To Fit in the SM1000 box.
>
> To be both Audio/USB interface  (in the SM1000 package) ,
>
> - and when piggyback boards permit, a standalone full digital radio.
>
> To have an open ecosystem/environment
>
> No special cooling requirements.
>
> To have the ARM processor core do as much as possible, and only use the
> FPGA for what the ARM processor cannot do , or cannot do efficiently.
> This means 'normal' people can code in the linux GNU eco system, and the
> amount of specialized work in the FPGA  is reduced. The FPGA will be
> used for function blocks like accelerators and digital radio interfacing
>
> --------------
>
> I have chosen the Xilinx Zynq XC7007S   hybrid CortexA9 / FPGA . The
> single core will give us 7x the computational power of the STM32F4 , and
> that is before we use the NEON instruction unit. The FPGA has 1.8Mb of
> variable aspect dual port block RAMs and 66 DSP units that will run at
> 350 MHz if pipelined.  The use of LPDDR2 will enable high power saving
> options.
>
> ***********The input I need from developers is :***********
>
> *** How much RAM do you think we need ? while linux will run in 16 MB
> (just!) I was thinking 64 or 128 MBytes. RAM costs money and power, so
> we cannot go overkill. W need enough room for verbose symbol tables,
> debugging and maybe  compilation on the target.
>
> How realistic is compile and linking large apps on the target with
> limited RAM ? I have run into memory limitations with recent GCC
> compilating on a constrained platform.  OR do we just cross compile ?
>
> We need some room for a 2nd FPGA image (~ 10 Mbits) , so that we can
> (partially or fully)  reconfigure the FPGA between TX/RX if we run out
> of configured fabric under some condition that I yet cannot think of.
>
> ***boot flash size: How much ? (linux image, FS) + FPGA images. flash
> will be QSPI.  16MB? 32MB ? 64 MB ? agani, memory costs money, and every
> dollar counts.  64 MBytes seems plenty to carry different options in the
> one image.
>
> In most cases, for RAM and boot flash larger parts can be fitted with
> same PCB design.
>
> ***
>
> The digital radio half (if used) will use a clean PLL+VCO synthesiser
> chip so that phase noise issues to not cause problems for other uses
> when operated at high power.  Most small single chip radios are designed
> for 100mW maximum and use at higher power, or large antennas pollutes
> radio spectrum.
>
> To keep costs down, the radio will use < 65 Msps ADC and DAC, and will
> notionally be a 28 MHz IF radio when used > 50 MHz. This is so it can
> use many of the $50 transverter kits and modules available.
>
> On aliases , the 28 MHz IF radio It will be capable of operation at 146
> MHz but if you want 'base station' quality, you will need to use a
> converter.
>
> -glen
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freetel-codec2 mailing list
> Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
>
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2

Reply via email to