(For reference, the thread Alan is referring to is here
<https://groups.io/g/repeater-builder/topic/a_poll_for_preference_analog/80561243?p=Created,,,20,1,0,0::recentpostdate%2Fsticky,,,20,2,0,80561243&jump=1>
.)

I get the feeling that proprietary vs. open (in the sense of
licensing/patents) isn't the most important issue for most hams per se.
However, it does manifest itself indirectly in several ways. One way in
particular is increased difficulty in implementation for third parties; for
instance, Icom was the only source for new D-STAR radios for quite a while
until Kenwood came out with (and then discontinued) the TH-D74A.
Ironically, the seemingly high usage of DMR in the commercial space likely
lowered the adoption cost enough such that it's increasingly becoming one
of the preferred VHF/UHF digital voice modes.

Anyway, promoting "open" in the sense of "ease of adoption" (patent/royalty
free, implementable simply by linking in the Codec2 libraries, etc.) is
probably going to be the most productive way of arguing it overall.

(BTW, I recently had a QSO in 2020 mode and it sounded pretty good IMO. Of
course, it was far more sensitive to SNR and propagation disruptions than
700D and E, so I don't foresee using it too often--at least until we're
higher up in the sunspot cycle, anyway.)

-Mooneer K6AQ

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:09 PM Al Beard via Freetel-codec2 <
freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> Hi,
> Have you been reading the topic: A poll for preference. Analog or digital?
> on the RepeaterBuilder email group?
>
> It's all about audio quality or intelligibility.
>
> Not one has mentioned, *we are stuck using proprietary vocoders.*
>
> No innovation is possible either in the audio encoding or decoding,
> yet keeping the systems (data over radio layer) compatible.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Alan VK2ZIW
> Before the Big Bang, God, Sela.
> OpenWebMail 2.53, nothing in the cloud.
> _______________________________________________
> Freetel-codec2 mailing list
> Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
>
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2

Reply via email to