Hi Mooneer

 

An excellent suggestion

 

I agree with the concept and suggest that the mission be extended further to 
something like 

 

"promote the use of open source digital voice and data modes on commercial and 
amateur radio and encourage the development of resilient communication modes 
for adverse conditions"

 

This would give plenty of scope for the advancement of the technology way into 
the future

 

I agree with your key points, recognising that other participants may suggest 
others

 

Regards 

 

 

David Grove – VK2DWG

 

From: Mooneer Salem <moon...@gmail.com> 
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2022 09:07
To: digitalvo...@googlegroups.com; freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Freetel-codec2] Starting an organization for FreeDV/Codec2 development

 

Hi all,

 

Over the past year or so, there have been several occasions where it would have 
been beneficial to have had an official organization steering FreeDV and Codec2 
development. For instance, the ARDC does not currently offer grants to 
individuals <https://www.ampr.org/apply/#eligibility> , not to mention the 
recent discussion about Windows Defender 
<https://github.com/drowe67/freedv-gui/issues/213>  and what it would take to 
get FreeDV "trusted" by Microsoft. I'd like to brainstorm what such an 
organization would look like.

 

First off, what would the mission of such an organization be? This seems 
obvious at first glance ("promote the use of open source digital voice modes on 
amateur radio"), but what would that entail exactly? A few potential things off 
the top of my head:

 

* SM1000 replacement (faster hardware to support other FreeDV modes, Wi-Fi 
support for radios such as the IC-705, etc.)

* General software process improvements (code signing of binaries, hosted 
Debian/Fedora/etc. package repos, etc.)

* General advocacy (e.g. presence at more ham radio related events, Zoom/etc. 
presentations about HF digital voice)

* Offering grants to individual developers to develop Codec2 and FreeDV further 
(e.g. fixed-point ports, improved/more modes, etc.)

 

On first thought, it seems that a non-profit/501(c)3 structure would be most 
appropriate given the mission of such a potential organization and its 
dedication to open source, but I'm wondering if some other structure would fit 
better. Another possibility is structuring it more like a membership club (IIRC 
there was a digital voice club back in the FDMDV days but I forget offhand what 
it was).

 

Anyway, if you have any suggestions or comments, they would be most welcome. 

 

Thanks,

 

-Mooneer K6AQ

_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2

Reply via email to