> > They are open source (GPL) as well. > > Wait. Not "as well". That is a big difference between FT and a lot of other > projects. FT is under a BSD'ish license. We put a lot of thought behind the license. Should we play it up? Should we start making it really clear that our license encourages more innovation? Or is it too obvious? Is it too contentious? Leon ------------------------------------------------------------ To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Site: http://www.working-dogs.com/freetrade/ Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [FreeTrade] Interesting story on Slashdot Isaac Reuben
- Re: [FreeTrade] Interesting story on Slashdot Kent Nguyen
- Licenses (was: Re: [FreeTrade] Interesting st... Jon Stevens
- Re: Licenses (was: Re: [FreeTrade] Intere... Andres Salomon
- Re: Licenses (was: Re: [FreeTrade] Intere... Mark Menard
- Re: Licenses (was: Re: [FreeTrade] In... Jon Stevens
- [FreeTrade] Items in invoice list... Tom Jakobsen
- Re: [FreeTrade] Items in inv... Shannon -jj Behrens
- Re: Licenses (was: Re: [FreeTrade... Mark Menard
- Re: Licenses (was: Re: [Free... Jon Stevens
- Re: [FreeTrade] Interesting story on Slas... Leon and Vicky Atkinson
- Re: [FreeTrade] Interesting story on Slashdot Leon and Vicky Atkinson

