> I originally suggested allowing LIGHT to use the Adobe hinter because > the results were so close to the autohinter already. If we want to tie > LIGHT/NORMAL to the style of hinting used (y vs x+y), I wonder if it > would make sense to use the autohinter in full x+y mode for NORMAL, so > the table becomes: > > LIGHT NORMAL > TrueType Auto Bytecode > CFF Adobe Auto > Type 1 Adobe Auto
Not sure. Remember that what bytecode does is up to the designer. You'd get auto x+y for T1/CFF and something random for bytecode (regardless of v35 or v40). Also remember that some fontconfig-using toolkits only know slight, medium and full and will not allow per-font settings. I think this is no universal solution except choosing sides. Also, my patch is faulty because strcmp always returns 0 it seems... will post a better patch. _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
