On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Jan Alexander Steffens <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 9:27 PM Nikolaus Waxweiler <[email protected]>
wrote:
>>
>> > Is this the scheme that you are proposing?
>> >
>> > LIGHT NORMAL
>> > TrueType Auto v40
>> > CFF Adobe Adobe
>> > Type 1 Adobe Adobe
>
>
> LIGHT NORMAL
> TrueType Auto Bytecode
> CFF Adobe Auto
> Type 1 Adobe Auto
I dunno. Is LIGHT autohinter that bad? Indeed NORMAL has become lighter
with v40 and Adobe hinting. Why not leave LIGHT alone for autohinter? We
forgot about MONO and were bitten by it recently. What is wrong with this
scheme?
LIGHT NORMAL MONO
TT Auto v40 v35
CFF Auto Adobe Auto?
T1 Auto Adobe Auto?
Does it correspond to fontconfig with light, medium, and strong?
_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
