>> > If a developer believes that she/he needs to change the logger of >> > a project she/he starts to work with - that's good sign that this >> > developer has slightly distorted priorities. >> >> Well, it is a nice GSoC project IMHO. Not that I would implement it >> by myself... > > Current logging code is perfectly fine IMO, [...]
Good to hear that it satisfies you. However, it is far from perfect, believe me – I'm the one who mostly works on that. >> > For instance has anyone heard anything about the logger during >> > last years GSoC? >> >> The idea to add a logger library is just a few months old. > > I mean that even if a GSoC student working on adding some > functionality to Freetype (and who apparently was new to Freetype) > never complained about the logging functionality then the logging > code is not a problem at all. Well, as far as I can see, it's exactly as Armin described the situation: people insert `printf' statements for debugging. And the final code usually missed important debugging calls... Werner _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel