> I think everyone might be fine with these ideas, simply because,
> they don't even require an external library.
Some of them, however, are *not* easy to do right since you need quite
an intimate knowledge of the whole library to get decent results.
> These features will surely be helpful for debugging. And until the
> debate of external library converges, implementing them can run in
> parallel.
Yes.
> So Werner, if you think these are worth including, shall I start
> coding them? But still, the config file is something that has to be
> designed well and needs opinions.
Before doing any real coding I would like to see a `prototype'. Take
an arbitrary, small .c file from FreeType and `enrich' it with the
stuff you envision, then post it to the list.
BTW, are you going to submit a GSoC proposal? The prototype would
serve well then :-)
Werner
_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
