Thank you folks, I'll try that. Anyway here are the samples and I definitely
like the former more:

former: http://www.meldaproduction.com/download/ft211.jpg
latter: http://www.meldaproduction.com/download/ft246.jpg

Thanks!
Vojtech

2011/10/16 Wojtek Mamrak <[email protected]>

> Hi,
>
> try to use automatic hinter (auto-hinter) instead of bytecode one
> (which is default I believe).
>
> To use the former load_flag FT_LOAD_DEFAULT should be used.
> To use the latter load_flag FT_LOAD_FORCE_AUTOHINT should be used.
>
> regards
>
>
> 2011/10/16 suzuki toshiya <[email protected]>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > One of the most big change between 2.1.10 to 2.4.6 would be
> > that the genuine TrueType hinting is enabled because the patent
> > was expired.
> >
> > Anyway, I'm interested in the difference you prefer 2.1.10 than
> > 2.4.6, could you post some screen shots comparing both result?
> >
> > Regards,
> > mpsuzuki
> >
> > Vojtěch Meluzín wrote (2011/10/16 20:46):
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I recently tried to upgrade FT from 2.1.10 to 2.4.6, because the prior
> >> version couldn't been compiled on 64-bit mac os x. The latter one can be
> >> compiled, but the problem is that fonts look considerably different,
> worse
> >> I'd say. Have there been some changes I need to adapt to? (like some
> flags
> >> to turn off some new processing)
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance,
> >> Vojtech
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Freetype mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freetype mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Freetype mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype

Reply via email to