No, it is something different. Check http://www.freetype.org/freetype2/docs/reference/ft2-base_interface.html#FT_LOAD_TARGET_XXX
2011/10/16 Vojtěch Meluzín <[email protected]>: > Isn't that what I just did? You know, all I want is it to work the same way > it did before :(. > > Vojtech > > 2011/10/16 Wojtek Mamrak <[email protected]> >> >> Maybe try various types of hinting algorithms. >> >> 2011/10/16 Vojtěch Meluzín <[email protected]>: >> > Ok folks, so I checked various flags and they cause various changes to >> > the >> > appearance, but no luck so far, the 2.1 was still better. >> > FT_LOAD_DEFAULT does basically nothing as it is 0 anyway :) >> > FT_LOAD_NO_AUTOHINT does nothing as well >> > FT_LOAD_NO_HINTING makes everything kinda blurried >> > FT_LOAD_FORCE_AUTOHINT is probably the best, but still not good as 2.1 >> > >> > Vojtech >> > >> > Dne 16. října 2011 14:07 Vojtěch Meluzín <[email protected]> >> > napsal(a): >> >> >> >> Thank you folks, I'll try that. Anyway here are the samples and I >> >> definitely like the former more: >> >> >> >> former: http://www.meldaproduction.com/download/ft211.jpg >> >> latter: http://www.meldaproduction.com/download/ft246.jpg >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> Vojtech >> >> >> >> 2011/10/16 Wojtek Mamrak <[email protected]> >> >>> >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> try to use automatic hinter (auto-hinter) instead of bytecode one >> >>> (which is default I believe). >> >>> >> >>> To use the former load_flag FT_LOAD_DEFAULT should be used. >> >>> To use the latter load_flag FT_LOAD_FORCE_AUTOHINT should be used. >> >>> >> >>> regards >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> 2011/10/16 suzuki toshiya <[email protected]>: >> >>> > Hi, >> >>> > >> >>> > One of the most big change between 2.1.10 to 2.4.6 would be >> >>> > that the genuine TrueType hinting is enabled because the patent >> >>> > was expired. >> >>> > >> >>> > Anyway, I'm interested in the difference you prefer 2.1.10 than >> >>> > 2.4.6, could you post some screen shots comparing both result? >> >>> > >> >>> > Regards, >> >>> > mpsuzuki >> >>> > >> >>> > Vojtěch Meluzín wrote (2011/10/16 20:46): >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Hi, >> >>> >> >> >>> >> I recently tried to upgrade FT from 2.1.10 to 2.4.6, because the >> >>> >> prior >> >>> >> version couldn't been compiled on 64-bit mac os x. The latter one >> >>> >> can >> >>> >> be >> >>> >> compiled, but the problem is that fonts look considerably >> >>> >> different, >> >>> >> worse >> >>> >> I'd say. Have there been some changes I need to adapt to? (like >> >>> >> some >> >>> >> flags >> >>> >> to turn off some new processing) >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Thanks in advance, >> >>> >> Vojtech >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>> >> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> >>> >> Freetype mailing list >> >>> >> [email protected] >> >>> >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > _______________________________________________ >> >>> > Freetype mailing list >> >>> > [email protected] >> >>> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype >> >>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Freetype mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype >> > >> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freetype mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype > > _______________________________________________ Freetype mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
