>> Thanks, do you know how much difference the span batching made to >> performance? > > In depends on your program. Simple scanlines might be delivered at > once. Freetype won't wait for you to process each spam.
Jamie, could you suggest a documentation enhancement to cover the difficulty you've experienced? >> It's also been pointed out to me that setjmp/longjmp can be very >> slow (eg, 12ms of a 36ms call was spent in setjmp). Are there any >> plans to remove FTs dependence on these functions? > > This is definitely not a bottle neck, unless the font is crazy > complicated <https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Cabin+Sketch>. If > you are paranoid, you can increase FT_RENDER_POOL_SIZE > <http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/freetype/freetype2.git/tree/include/freetype/config/ftoption.h#n398>. This is probably also worth to be mentioned in the docs. Werner
