Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 23:41 +0200, Dirk Meyer wrote:
>> I will try to replace the imlib2 code with pixbuf and we will see. But
>> it is late now, I will do this tomorrow.
>
> Don't bother.  I ran the test and imlib2 is faster, but only by a slim
> margin (like 7%).  See attached benchmark.

pixbuf needs more time to load the images than it could ever safe. But
I noticed that some images from the flickr test look wrong when using
clutter 0.8. They look ok with 0.6.

>> But this is only a stupid performance test, loading 320 images at once
>> and creating 1300 candy _and_ clutter objects isn't daily use. I just
>> wanted to test if kaa.candy scales to avoid the problems we had with
>> kaa.canvas and the tv guide grid taking too much time.
>
> It's nice to know these sorts of performance characteristics, yeah.  So
> what do you think, will the tv guide be a problem?

No, it won't use images and text is faster.


Dischi

-- 
A real friend is a friend with chocolate.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Freevo-devel mailing list
Freevo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel

Reply via email to