Jason Tackaberry wrote: > On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 23:41 +0200, Dirk Meyer wrote: >> I will try to replace the imlib2 code with pixbuf and we will see. But >> it is late now, I will do this tomorrow. > > Don't bother. I ran the test and imlib2 is faster, but only by a slim > margin (like 7%). See attached benchmark.
pixbuf needs more time to load the images than it could ever safe. But I noticed that some images from the flickr test look wrong when using clutter 0.8. They look ok with 0.6. >> But this is only a stupid performance test, loading 320 images at once >> and creating 1300 candy _and_ clutter objects isn't daily use. I just >> wanted to test if kaa.candy scales to avoid the problems we had with >> kaa.canvas and the tv guide grid taking too much time. > > It's nice to know these sorts of performance characteristics, yeah. So > what do you think, will the tv guide be a problem? No, it won't use images and text is faster. Dischi -- A real friend is a friend with chocolate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Freevo-devel mailing list Freevo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel