Jason Tackaberry wrote: > On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 22:40 +0200, Dirk Meyer wrote: >> Yes, well InProgressCallback is an InProgress object right now. If you >> change that I have to check my code if it is broken. But since I still >> can yield it, it should work. > > I probably didn't want to include InProgressCallback in that list. I > was thinking as arguments passed to the constructor, where it makes > sense for InProgressAny and InProgressAll, but not for > InProgressCallback, which takes a, well, callback. :) > > But at the very least we'll be able to remove the Signal specific code > from its constructor.
That will break some code, but it would be easy to find. Remove it and grep for InProgressCallback to fix stuff. Dischi -- Save time... see it my way. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Freevo-devel mailing list Freevo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel
