On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 09:02:46AM -0300, Rob Shortt wrote: > Well if number 2 fails then we should take this route. :) Web site > content and 'scrapers' are a grey area. I didn't accept a licence > agreement by going to their site. If companies want to restrict access > to a site that is wide open to the internet they should do so by > technical means, that is the only way IMO. If apple can't give > "permission" (which they are giving us anyway by having this stuff > available on a non-protected web site) then there is no way at all that > we can stop someone else from developing Freevo plugins and hosting them > on another site.
I agree that if you never visit the site, you're hardly subject to the EULA, but this is one of those things that would fall under "good faith". It is reasonable to assume that Apple would want us to get permission. Aubin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
