This is the rpm installed by my 7.1:
glibc-2.2.2-10.i386.rpm
I noticed that the pkgs has:
glibc-2.2-12.i386.rpm
At 10:45 AM 4/26/2001 +0100, you wrote:
>Which version of freevsd-pkgs did you try to install? Which version of
>glibc does redhat 7.1 come with?
>
>Damion.
>
>Aubrey Ghen wrote:
>>
>> The initial problems I faced with a red hat 7.1 are:
>>
>> mod_bind would not compile because I did not choose the right packages
>> during the 7.1 install. I reinstalled with more packages and it compiled.
>>
>> When I ran vsd-genskel.pl and it tried to install the rpm addons it
>> complained of a glibc conflict and failed.
>>
>> So I am unclear of what to do about the glibc conflicts.
>>
>> -Aubrey
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Damion Parry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 1:24 AM
>> Subject: Re: Source build
>>
>> > Good Morning,
>> >
>> > The difference here is that that you downloaded the main branch from
>> > CVS. This branch is being used to develop the 1.5 functionality and is
>> > to be considered EXTREMELY UNSTABLE. After the 1.4.7 release and branch
>> > called pre_1_4_8 was created, to allow similtaneous development of 1.5
>> > and bug fixes + stable development looking towards the 1.4.8 release. I
>> > would strongly advise against using the main branch for anything other
>> > than testing.
>> >
>> > If it is the 1.4.7 release that you are after (with SSL enabled), I
>> > would suggest that you obtain a set of source with the following
>> > command:
>> >
>> > > cvs checkout -r release_1_4_7 freevsd
>> >
>> > and then compile that in the normal way. Please let me know if you
>> > require anymore information. You're the first person (that I know of),
>> > to attempt a 7.1 compile (you've beat me to it), so if you could let us
>> > know how you get on I'd be very greatful.
>> >
>> > Damion.
>> >
>> > > Aubrey Ghen wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hello.
>> > >
>> > > I have a question.
>> > >
>> > > Previously I had installed freevsd from source with SSL enabled.
>> > >
>> > > when done this way the command vsdadm would require flags such as
>> > >
>> > > vsdadm vs_create localhost -v [virtualserver] -i [ipaddress] -h [fqdn]
>> > > -u[# of users] -q [quota]
>> > >
>> > > is also created the skel under
>> > >
>> > > /vsd/skel/deafult
>> > >
>> > > My confusion is that I just built the source with the default
>> > > configure,
>> > > and vsdadm works like it does from the rpm install,
>> > > and the skel is generated under /vsd/skel/
>> > >
>> > > So im just wondering the difference between compiling with SSL and
>> > > without?
>> > >
>> > > thanks
>> > > Aubrey
>> >
>
