On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 01:45:47PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Dirk Nehring dixit: > > > I sync the gcc4-patches with 2.4.34-pre3 from the kernel > > maintainer. > > We _still_ don't have gcc4.
Yes, so it should not bother. It's extracted from the original kernel patch, regression tested on some platforms (http://lwn.net/Articles/200057/). It's not a must for 1.0, but I want to have trunk and branch in sync. > > >* package/liblzo > > Bigger version update (1.08 -> 2.02). All new Linux distributions are > > using this version. Needed for openvpn. Since we're using openvpn > > every day, this will be tested fully before the 1.0 release. > > This is also an API+ABI change, so I'd suggest testing a full build > of all packages first. Build works, testing will be done on Monday. OpenVPN supports lzo2 fully on other platforms. I like to see this also in the first release. I forgot to mention package/openssl, there was a security fix in this version! > > Overall: my impression is that we forked off the branch way too early. Yes, one or two week2 for stabilizing would be good. * new config filesystem fwcf * new network style configuration (first working version 2 days ago!) * interface renaming (vlan1 -> eth0.1, etc.). I haven't seen any discussion about this issue yet. wbx? * broking webif, does only work with nvram * no save/restore function in webif yet * resync network packages with upstream version (almost finished, but not fully tested) * currently, pcmcia-cs does not run in some situations (Markus' issue) Dirk _______________________________________________ freewrt-developers mailing list [email protected] https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
