> The webif story: > What to do with webif/webif2 for 1.0? Some days ago I talked to > Markus and he said, he needs webif for some projects, so I decided > to keep nvram based network configuration and webif in parallel to > our new network configuration. > > Should we keep it this way, or will be webif2 for our new network > configuration ready in a few weeks? Ok, maybe this was a bit misunderstanding... It's ok for me to fully drop nvram support now to get a clean base release 1.0.
I tried to investigate the x-wrt work and the buildroot-ng stuff and noticed that x-wrt goes heavily the OpenWRT way and hangs on with Whiterussian for now. In webif2 I started to take what I found usuable from x-wrt and cleaned it up for a first shot. Next I'm thinking about rewriting the network config stuff to interact with the "interfaces" file. What still keeps missing is a kind of registry for the other stuff: ntp-Server, syslog settings, timezone, dhcp settings ... I'd like to take a deeper look to the buildroot-ng style with an /etc/config directory for that as it simplifies the webif development A LOT!! So, please get rid of nvram and don't support both. Webif may even be backported to 1_0 if it works. It's not that important. WBX: please don't use "eth0" in /etc/network/interfaces try to always use the vlan-interface eth0.0 and configure the ports for our supported devices. bye, Markus _______________________________________________ freewrt-developers mailing list [email protected] https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
