Hi, On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 at 17:11 +0100, Lothar Gesslein wrote: > (Forgot to cc to the list ... here you are) > > Hi, > > i've just tested it again. > > First thing i noticed: please link http://www.freewrt.org:3000/ to > http://www.freewrt.org:3000/config. It's a quite strange site you see if > you forget to type in the "config".
It was the development url. The Image Builder moved to: http://wib.freewrt.org/ > Second thing i noticed: the rather bad layout and style. > It's fixed to 800x600, while most users have more than double the space > on their screen. Especially for the device/packet selection lists, more > space is really needed, and there is no reason not to use at least the > full vertical space. That's difficult to solve. But may be David says something to this point. > Theese lists could also take some color to distinguish the individual > rows, for example one row white, the next row light grey, the next one > white again ... you know what i mean. Good idea, please add a enhancement ticket, so that it get not lost. > I'm currently not able to actually test the generated image, so no > "works/doesn't work" statement... but some ideas for enhancements: > > Make the config file downloadable, and a "upload an old config" option, > to be able to build a second image with only some few packages changed. > Or a option to include it to the image file as bz2, so i don't have to > care about storing it somewhere. > OR > Store the config on the server with the image id, and let the user input > his id to work on his config again. And include the id to the image, so > no-one forgets. Add feature requests to our ticket system. > Let the user include his own files to the image (like the mypackage > package in the buildroot). > > The ssh-key include thing is a real killer-feature, include it to the > wib. > > And i worry about the performance of the wib once the floodgates open > with the 1.0 release. It does run on the same machine with the > webserver, svn and mailinglists, right? It should be reniced to not > disturb the other processes since a dedicated box is overhead now. > And some limitation on how many images can be generated from a single ip > in a fixed ammount of time, to prevent a "DoS". You know, there are some > people out there not liking the FreeWRT project ... Let see if we hit any performance problems. If yes, then I switch to flyingfish another webserver. thx Waldemar -- don't open your wrt, free it http://www.freewrt.org _______________________________________________ freewrt-developers mailing list [email protected] https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
