On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 10:06:18AM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Dirk Nehring dixit: > > >Besides special fileserver > >requirements I do not see a real need for 64bit-filepointer on such a > >limited plattform. > > Exactly because *you* don't have a need for it, while *others* see > a need for it ??? for example, wbx@ just tells me he thinks it's > worthwhile e.g. for storage servers ??? I want to make it an option, > so that e.g. you won't be a "victim" of it being on by default.
As I said it's OK for me, but the one who enabled should test the functionality with all packages, especially in combination with the current uclibc and kernel configuration! Last time I check it smbfs does not support files >2Gib (but cifsfs should work). Dirk _______________________________________________ freewrt-developers mailing list [email protected] https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
