Am Samstag, den 18.08.2007, 21:56 +0200 schrieb Ralph Passgang:
> Am Samstag, 18. August 2007 09:53:58 schrieb Sebastian Palarus:
> > Am Freitag, den 17.08.2007, 19:08 +0200 schrieb Ralph Passgang:
> > > Am Donnerstag, 16. August 2007 16:48:25 schrieb Sebastian Palarus:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I try to filter the traffic between wan and lan ports over a bridge,
> > > > but it doesn't work. Here my config
> > > >
> > > > FreeWRT 1.03 (download @ http://wib.freewrt.org)
> > > > Linksys WRT54GL
> > > >
> > > > ----/etc/network/interface
> > > > # LAN ports
> > > > auto eth0.0
> > > > iface eth0.0 inet manual
> > > >         switch-ports 0 1 2 3 5*
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > # WAN port
> > > > auto eth0.1
> > > > iface eth0.1 inet manual
> > > >         switch-ports 4 5
> > > > ----
> > > >
> > > > ----/etc/fw/setbridge.sh
> > > > /usr/sbin/brctl addbr br0
> > > > /usr/sbin/brctl addif br0 eth0.0
> > > > /usr/sbin/brctl addif br0 eth0.1
> > > > /bin/ip link set eth0.0 up
> > > > /bin/ip link set eth0.1 up
> > > > /bin/ip link set br0 up
> > > > /bin/ip link show
> > > > ----
> > > >
> > > > -the bridge works fine, but nothing is blocked
> > > > -tcpdump -i br0 shows all packets
> > > > -iptables doesn't know -m physdev
> > > >
> > > > What's the problem? netfilter (missing patch) ? nic-driver?
> > >
> > > Normally ebtables is used for filtering a bridge, but I don't get the
> > > reason why you need a bridge at all?!?
> > >
> > > Just try this:
> > >
> > >  # LAN + WAN ports
> > >  auto eth0.0
> > >  iface eth0.0 inet static
> > >         switch-ports 0 1 2 3 4 5*
> > >   address <your-ip>
> > >   netmask <your-netmask>
> > >   broadcast +
> > >   gateway <your gateway>
> > >
> > > You can put the wan port in the same vlan as the lan ports, so the
> > > internal switch will be used and you don't need the bridge.
> > >
> > > a multiport-bridge is technically exactly a switch.
> > >
> > > and even if you want the bridge anyways, why not configure it in your
> > > interface file... something like this should work:
> > >
> > > auto br0
> > > iface br0 inet static
> > >   bridge-ifaces eth0.0 eth0.1
> > >   address <your-ip>
> > >   netmask <your-netmask>
> > >   broadcast +
> > >   gateway <your gateway>
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >  Ralph
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to protect some hosts, but in this networksegment I can't change
> > the networkconfiguration. So I can't add a routing firewall and I need a
> > bridge.
> > Yesterday i tried kamikaze, but the filtering over a bridge did not work
> > and iptables did not know -m physdev too.
> >
> > I don't need ebtables, because ebtables filter non-ip-packets.
> 
> a bridge is working on the second layer, when you want to protect your hosts 
> in every aspect, you will need ebtables (think of mac spoofing for example). 
> for ip related stuff only, iptables is enough of course.
> 
> > But now I have a big problem. Accidental I enter 'vi <binfile>'.
> > Kamikaze answered with SegFaut and now the Router don't want boot
> > anymore . Next week I want try to rescue the router over serial (JP2),
> > but first I have to braze on a cable.
> > Has anybody experience and tips for me?
> >
> > Now I see, that the package iptables-mod-extra_1.3.3-2_mipsel.ipk off
> > whiterussian really contains the file libipt_physdev.so.
> > Dumm gelaufen;-)
> 
> we do not support kamikaze or whiterussian, because both are openwrt 
> releases. 
> this is freewrt ;-P
> 
> > regards,
> > Sebastian
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > freewrt-users mailing list
> > freewrt-users@freewrt.org
> > https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-users
> 
Hi,

yes, I know the history of openwrt and freewrt and I like freewrt
better, because 'nvram ...' and other things of openwrt are not really
unixlike. So I have a wish for the future.
If it's possible (and stable), please integrate libipt_physdev.so,
ebtables.ko and physdev.ko. Newly ebtabes.so include the patch
bridge-nf, which enables to use iptables between bridged devices. dmesg
should print:
---
Bridge firewalling registered
Ebtables v2.0 registered
---

regards,
Sebastian

_______________________________________________
freewrt-users mailing list
freewrt-users@freewrt.org
https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-users

Reply via email to