Hi all. On Wed Aug 22 2007 at 10:45:59 CEST, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote (https://www.freewrt.org/list-archives/freewrt-users/2007-August/000339.html): > On Tue, 21 AuGg 2007 at 10:42 +0200, Sebastian Palarus wrote: > > yes, I know the history of openwrt and freewrt and I like freewrt > > better, because 'nvram ...' and other things of openwrt are not really > > unixlike. So I have a wish for the future. > > If it's possible (and stable), please integrate libipt_physdev.so, > > ebtables.ko and physdev.ko. Newly ebtabes.so include the patch > > bridge-nf, which enables to use iptables between bridged devices. dmesg > > should print: > > --- > > Bridge firewalling registered > > Ebtables v2.0 registered > > Sorry, this will not happen, unless someone fixes a grave bug in > 2.4.34 and ebtables. This bug has cost me a lot of time and I got a > lot of grey hairs.
I'd be interested to know what bug this refers to.
--
Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ freewrt-users mailing list freewrt-users@freewrt.org https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-users
