Robert
On 8/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting Robert Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So if 'valid' simulations are being used to give the 'wrong' answers, what
> does that tell us about simulation? Is there ever any hope of objectivity
> (I'll give away the answer to that: no) or do all social simulations -
> political or economic - inevitably reflect the prejudices of their author or
> funder?
Validated simulations, by definition, reproduce something that the authors (or
funders) deem relevant as a performance metric. But that's not a problem with
models or simulations, assuming the metrics are documented. If the authors or
funders are prone to choosing easy, low dimensional things to fit, they just
need to be more ambitious.
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
