Title: Message
Robert,
Thanks for asking.  I'm getting a little help from Gabor on the use of zoo, and will eventually learn how to code the things I want.   The R core is really neat in that what would be 50 tangled lines of code in lisp are simple short expressions in R.  That, however, means learning lots and lots of objects and functions with complex properties and no good reference.  It really is a sophisticated environment requiring high level user knowledge.   Like I looked and looked tonight to find out how to print one graph on top of another, or open multiple graph windows.  Couldn't find it. 
 
My other problem is the one that had me writing my own entire software interface and analytic routines in the first place.  I seem to be using curves for a different purpose than other people.    Say you have a time-series of measures that reflect the life history of several independent overlapping natural feedback loop systems, each with their own separate growth, climax, disordering and decay periods. ¸¸¸¸.·´ ¯ `·.¸¸¸¸     You wouldn't want your way of rendering the record of those events to erase all that critical beginning and ending information, and paint the whole history with shapes displaying the same wiggly but basically uneventful dynamics throughout.  That would make the underlying systems much harder to find and figure out.
 
That's what I think splines do, for example, hide all the natural system beginning and ending periods.      It may not be impossible to use splines to faithfully represent underlying dynamics, but only the rendering philosophy of their designers.    Of course stochastic and simple differential equations are much worse.   On the other hand, I don't know all the kinds of non-parametric methods of rendering histories of events, but I get no hint from the discussion that anyone is aware of this problem.   I can't find anyone who seems to be using the shapes of their curves as a way of identifying and investigating the behavior of natural feedback loop systems.   Everyone still seems to be treating nature as if it should be following some formula, instead of rendering events as part of local systems development.  
 
Do you know of anyone else with this complaint?

Phil Henshaw                       ¸¸¸¸.·´ ¯ `·.¸¸¸¸
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
680 Ft. Washington Ave
NY NY 10040                      
tel: 212-795-4844                
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]         
explorations: www.synapse9.com   
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Holmes
Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2006 7:15 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] R tutorial for idiots.

Exactly what you want to do with these different timescales? If it's just a case of sticking two lines on the same graph, that's simple. If it's some multi-temporal statistic (is there such a thing?) that you know of but isn't in R, then just code it up as an R function.

Can you give us clarification? What are the statistic/statistics you want to calculate to compare your time-series?

Robert 

On 9/23/06, Phil Henshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Who would guess just asking the R help forum would turn up a grad med student whose PhD in modeling time series of epidemics with R, living around the corner!     I guess I'm now officially one small step up from rank beginner...    Anyway, it doesn't appear that R makes it at all easy to use data with arbitrary time scales, however, which is disappointing.    I just want a graphing database that other systems researchers use that treats time as a real number.   Is that too much to ask??     R's time-series objects appear to require orderly data with points at constant time periods, and can't relate to others with different periods...   My data and issues  tend to fail on both counts!    
 
The session did give me a whole bunch of names of other people working on non-parametric data imaging, so I'll bet someone somewhere deals directly with the underlying problem, i.e. that life most certainly happens, but just not on schedule!     I've gotten more than a couple great suggestions on FRIAM!    Any others? 
 

Phil Henshaw                       ¸¸¸¸.·´ ¯ `·.¸¸¸¸

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to