Right!  Or perhaps by somebody who anticipated that they would all fail. 

Why is not complexity theory a counsel of dispair.  And counsels of dispair are 
urgings toward a libertine life.   On the theory that my raping and muggering 
is as likely to produce social good as my non raping and non muggering, why 
dont I just go out and rape and mugger?  How can I possible be an Apollonian in 
a non-linear world.  
'Live drink and be merry because tomorrow we will die..... nor NOT."

Nick   


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Phil Henshaw 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Sent: 4/13/2007 3:41:08 PM 
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Can you guess the source.


No clue, but sounds like a normal view from the 50's 60's 70's 80's or 90's?   
Clearly not someone who knew about new classes of promising options that hadn't 
been tried yet though...


On 4/11/07, Nicholas Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
I am curious to know if anybody in Friam-land will recognize the following 
passage.  No Fair using google. 

It is NOT from the Gettysburg Address.  

"Our work is guided by the sense that we may be the last generation in the 
experiment with living. But we are a minority--the vast majority of our people 
regard the temporary equilibriums of our society and world as eternally 
functional parts. In this is perhaps the outstanding paradox; we ourselves are 
imbued with urgency, yet the message of our society is that there is no viable 
alternative to the present. Beneath the reassuring tones of the politicians, 
beneath the common opinion that America will "muddle through," beneath the 
stagnation of those who have closed their minds to the future, is the pervading 
feeling that there simply are no alternatives, that our times have witnessed 
the exhaustion not only of Utopias, but of any new departures as well. Feeling 
the press of complexity upon the emptiness of life, people are fearful of the 
thought that at any moment things might be thrust out of control. They fear 
change itself, since change might smash whatever invisible framework seems to 
hold back chaos for them now. For most Americans, all crusades are suspect, 
threatening. The fact that each individual sees apathy in his fellows 
perpetuates the common reluctance to organize for change. The dominant 
institutions are complex enough to blunt the minds of their potential critics, 
and entrenched enough to swiftly dissipate or entirely repel the energies of 
protest and reform, thus limiting human expectancies. Then, too, we are a 
materially improved society, and by our own improvements we seem to have 
weakened the case for further change. "


Nicholas S. Thompson
Research Associate, Redfish Group, Santa Fe, NM ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Professor of Psychology and Ethology, Clark University ([EMAIL PROTECTED])




============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to