Since .NET 2.0 implements covariance, implementing Prolog to traverse these networks amounts to nesting one YIELD-ing block for each literal in a Horn Clause. SEE: http://yieldprolog.sourceforge.net/, which is really all LINQ is doing. I'd think it would be a natural step from there given the prolog-like syntax of SPARQL.
Robert Howard Phoenix, Arizona -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marcus G. Daniels Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 10:37 AM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] General-Purpose Computing on a Semantic NetworkSubstrate Hi, Without having to introduce a new virtual machine, how about adding SPARQL support to LINQ? Marcus ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
