Marko,
Redfish is very interested in this. I especially like this line of
thinking:
From 4.9:
...Once the Fhat RVM has
completed computing that particular RDF sub-network, it can halt and
another CPU can
pick up the process on a yet another area of the RDF network that
needs computing by the
RDF software. In this model of computing, data doesn’t move to the
process, the process
moves to the data.
We are interested in models for distributed computing that can easily
exist in very heterogeneous environments such as high performance
computers/web service servers/desktop PCs down to phones and other
specialized network devices with low levels of resources, but
interestingly also lowest latency with regard to the so called 'user'.
Would this new language make managing data and process on multiple
computers easier to program for in a more general sense? How do we
make a network based computer that gets us away from having to worry
about where a particular data set is -- or where a particular process
is running? I know this is focused on the semantic web but can this
help me deal with manageing my many overlapping data streams that I
want available on any computer I come in contact with -- such as
model output or more importantly digital photos, mp3s, and videos?
I think a wed-tech talk would be very welcome.
--joshua
---
Joshua Thorp
Redfish Group
624 Agua Fria, Santa Fe, NM
On Apr 26, 2007, at 8:01 AM, Marko A. Rodriguez wrote:
LANL is currently building a compiler and virtual machine that is
compliant with the specification in the paper. If RedFish is
interested, perhaps in a month or two, I could demo this computing
paradigm at a Wednesday tech session.
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
