Interesting paper! I do like seeing the phrase:
Individual-based models (IBMs) allow researchers to study how system level properties emerge from the adaptive behaviour of individuals The collective presupposes the individual. Information and properties of the part flow to the whole—not the other way around. The cause-and-effect arrow of implication is one-way. Robert Howard Phoenix, Arizona _____ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Roberts Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 11:25 AM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: [FRIAM] Fwd: ABM FRIAMers, I received this today from several of my co-workers and thought I'd pass it on. I still can't help but feeling that in general, *way* too many words are being used to describe ABM (and IBM) methodologies. The underlying concept of object-oriented software design as the basis for ABM simulation architecture is just so straight forward and intuitive that I am repeatedly amazed at how people continue to make such a big, mysterious deal out of it. But, I suppose that's just me, and my opinion... --Doug -- Doug Roberts, RTI International [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 505-455-7333 - Office 505-670-8195 - Cell **************************************************** This is a very interesting resource re: Agent Based Modeling. http://www.openabm.org/site/ Note also the current efforts re: ODD (Overview, Design Concepts and Details) –based descriptions (cf. attached manuscript).
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
