Read the articles and tell me what you think. But I believe the answer to your last question is "No".
Robert On 7/3/07, Phil Henshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The task of associating abstract and real things is rather complicated, and often made more so by using the same names for them, so it appears that when you're referring to a physical system you're discussing entirely some network of abstract rules, for example. Even though you say the article refers to physical systems, is it possible they just switch back and forth between ways of referring to things, while being consistent with an 'information world' model they assume everyone understands to be the baseline of abstract discussion? Phil Henshaw ¸¸¸¸.·´ ¯ `·.¸¸¸¸
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
