Glen E. P. Ropella wrote:
> You're saying that the members of churches,
> neighborhood watch groups, schools, etc. purposefully engage in the
> attempt to encourage (impose, coax, coerce, etc.) others around them to
> act and think like them.  This social engineering is perfectly akin to
> an individual engineering her physical environment to make her use of
> resources more efficient.
>
> If that's what you're saying, then I disagree.  I don't disagree that
> this is the _effect_ of these groups.  I disagree that they do it
> _purposefully_... i.e. they don't intend to do it.
>   
Option 1 is that a recipient can't understand a concern or is unable to 
act on a request for change from a signaler
Option 2 is that a recipient understands the concern but has a different 
value system from the signaler that renders it moot

If the effect of their behavior is damaging in some important way to the 
signaler, then it doesn't really matter what the intent is.   The 
signaler's options are to displace the recipient from the environment or 
move themselves.
> The set-up you presented was sub-group neutral.  You said:  "Discussants
> who might not even be able to tolerate one another in person can find
> common ground."  And normal people can and usually _do_ look for and
> discover common ground within 5 minutes of conversation.
>
> Only a pathological person cannot find common ground within the span of
> a normal conversation.  And this is regardless of what peer group is
> under consideration.
>   
Fair enough.   One point is that people vary on many dimensions, and in 
my view, the more the better.   There's no shortage of people.   My 
example is indeed sub-group neutral and was to illustrate that two 
people having many dimensions of incompatibility could still communicate 
through abstractions, which in my view, this is a good thing to 
facilitate and encourage.    Another separate view is that groups can be 
oppressive to the individual, and that the individual may well not be at 
fault when so oppressed.  My view is that the world does not fall apart 
when people do their own thing.    The forces that create groups are 
much stronger than the forces that ensure individuality. 

Marcus



============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to