Here's another thought about this...
Zero Point Energy, AKA ZPE, has been a somewhat serious undertaking
of various scientists. There is also TONS of new-age quackery in
this area.
I accede to Jan's assertion that ZPE is a serious undertaking of
scientists. I even am willing to posit that there may be some "way
cool" results that come from this work.
The second point Jan makes (TONS of "newage" quackery) fits the Orbo
announcements, although it isn't as much "newage" as modern business
snake-oil. If what they claim is real, let's just wait for it,
because it *should* transform much more than just the bottom line of
their company.
What I am curious about, what I want to know what others think about
this, is why do we believe that *more* available energy will improve
the world?
Does it not seem possible (even likely if we look closely) that the
ills of this planet today are very likely positively correlated with
energy consumption?
I think the main axis of the trade-space is "global" vs "local" (in
space and time) optimizations.
What is the collective belief here? Is more accessible energy really
going to improve the lot of the planet or merely allow us to pave it
over more quickly?
- Steve
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
