It's finding a deeper impasse. I think.     Many deep impasses are 'hidden
in sight', and it takes an ability to stop and wonder about what everyone
else is apparently skipping over to catch them, the ability to see things
'oddly' out of place is one way I see it.     Like, why is everyone
proposing new ways to accelerate resource consumption as the way to solve
the accelerating shortfalls due to resource exhaustion?     It's a kind of
an obvious question, that apparently everyone thinks someone else must have
answered so it can't be 'important' to ask themselves...  

 

phil

 

From: Orlando Leibovitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 9:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] The Brain and Creativity 2

 

Orlando here,

I agree with the conclusions of the article and with your analysis. We all
(most of us) have sudden insight from time to time. What I want to know is
where the really original, genius type insight comes from. What is it that
allows Newton or Einstein or Picasso to see something essential that no one
has seen or understood before? 

O

Phil Henshaw wrote: 

On reading Lehrer's article I'm impressed how far the neuroscience is
getting, as well as pleased that the direct imaging of the physical process
of 'sudden insight' seems to correspond so closely to what I described based
on the necessities of developmental processes in general.    That all
reports seem to agree, as Lehrer described Jung-Beeman's observations, that
the 'trick' to sudden insight seems to be to thoroughly explore a question
and come to a real impasse in thinking first, reducing your question to a
complete unknown, and then defocus your attention and let the parts of the
brain that are more widely connected go to work on their own.   

 

The particular observation that a few seconds before the 'ah ha' moment
there is a sharp increase in 'gamma rhythm', thought to indicate the
'binding' of neurons into a new network, and associated with a particular
location.  perfectly describes the emergence by developmental growth of a
new complex system observable in the animated buzz of local neural activity
required to create a MRI blood flow hot spot.     Then. on making the
missing cognitive connection across the impasse resolved, our mind says "Oh
sure,.. that should have been obvious all along".      What's so odd is that
we should so depreciate the value of the major preceding effort and value of
reducing the problem to an impasse in the first place, though.   That's what
seems to me to precisely locate where we then needed to switch to freely
searching the universe of our experience in order to make the missing
connections. and a perfectly good reason once resolved to suddenly make a
huge amount of sense and give unusual immediate satisfaction.

 

No if we could only do that with the glaring contradictions of the world
around us.

 

Phil

 

 

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Phil Henshaw
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 8:24 PM
To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] The Brain and Creativity

 

The study of individual events is of the accumulative creative processes of
development.     I'm not sure what makes us think creativity happens in a
'flash' without preceding and following long chains of accumulative
development, but it's an illusion that it happens bye itself.    Maybe the
appearance that the flash of insight or creativity happens 'out of the blue'
comes from how exploratory processes follow a path that then telegraph where
they're headed once they take off, and then getting there is experienced as
a sudden confirmation, having the whole path culminate in an instant, or
something like that.    

 

There are moments where the excitement level rises sharply, for sure, but
invariably that is based on a rather long accumulation of digression and
digestion, to then also invariably be followed by a rather long accumulative
process of completion and connection.    There's no reason the middle point
should get the credit in my book.    The "ah ha" instant is only a little
pleasant flashing thing in the middle of long and complex history of groping
around and asking the unanswered questions.    Without those fore and aft
parts of the exploratory process there'd be nothing to "break through" and
produce the "flash" as far as I  can tell.    

 

As to the creative content that you see displayed in the culmination of
works of genius, how a scientist's questions or a painter's every brush
stroke vibrate with their whole way of seeing the world, you got me.  I
don't know how that works.

 

Phil

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Orlando Leibovitz
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 11:04 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: [FRIAM] The Brain and Creativity

 

The July 28 2008 issue of the New Yorker contains an article titled The
Eureka Hunt: Why Do Good Ideas Come To Us When They Do. See
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/07/28/080728fa_fact_lehrer  for an
abstract.

Although the article talks about human insight I think it touches on human
creativity. I am interested in anyone's description (definition) of
creativity and a comparison of creativity in art and science. I would also
appreciate any thoughts about the  creative differences and/or similarities
that may exist in different cultures.

My own feeling is that creativity, for example, in visual art and in
theoretical physics contains the same attributes. Einstein was as much an
artist as a physicist. I realize theoretical physics must deal with the
"real world" but the process of original discovery seems the same to me.

O

-- 

Orlando Leibovitz

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

www.orlandoleibovitz.com

Studio Telephone: 505-820-6183

 



  _____  



 
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

 

-- 



Orlando Leibovitz

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

www.orlandoleibovitz.com

Studio Telephone: 505-820-6183

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to