I would like to respond to Wittgenstein's idea that a mathematical proof should 
be called an invention rather than a discovery. When solving a Suduko puzzle, I 
often produce a logical deduction that the solution is unique. It seems clear 
to me that I discovered that there is only one solution. I don't see how to 
make any sense of the idea that I "invented" the fact that there is only one 
solution.



"Wittgensteins technique was not to reinterpret certain particular proofs, 
but, rather, to redescribe the whole of mathematics in such a way that 
mathematical logic would appear as the philosophical aberration he believed it 
to be, and in a way that dissolved entirely the picture of mathematics as a 
science which discovers facts about mathematical objects  .  I shall try again 
and again, he said, to show that what is called a mathematical discovery had 
much better be called a mathematical invention.  There was, on his view, 
nothing for the mathematician to discover.  A proof in mathematics does not 
establish the truth of a conclusion; if fixes, rather, the meaning of certain 
signs. The inexorability of mathematics, therefore, does not consist in 
certain knowledge of mathematical truths, but in the fact that mathematical 
propositions are grammatical.  To deny, for example, that two plus two equals 
four is not to disagree with a widely held view about a matter of fact;  it is 
to show ignorance of the meanings of the terms involved.  Wittgenstein 
presumably thought that if he could persuade Turing  to see mathematics in this 
light, he could persuade anybody."

Turing apparently gave up on W. a few lectures later.

I have to admit the distinction that W. is making here does not move me 
particularly.  It seems to me as much of a discovery to find out what is 
implied by the premises of a logical system as to find out how many electrons 
there are in an iron atom, and since logic is always at work behind empirical 
work, I cannot get very excited about the difference.  Perhaps because I am dim 
witted.

No response necessary.

Nick





Nicholas S. Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology,

Clark University ([EMAIL PROTECTED])








============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to