Not quite. It's more about assimilation than simple conquest. There's a good
discussion of this in the intro to Hugh Thomas's "The English & the
Normans", page 6 onwards (it's available online through google book search
at http://tinyurl.com/6ljma5

Though if you want to limit it to purely the anglo/african issue, it doesn't
seem unreasonable to date this to the start of the 19th century (Abolition
of Slave Trade Act 1807, Abolition of Slavery Act 1833). Presumably race
cropped up somewhere in the parliamentary

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Owen Densmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Aren't these a bit different than conversations about race?


> In all the cases below, there were wars involved, and the conquerers did
> not trouble themselves about conversations about race.
>
>    -- Owen
>
>
>
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to