On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Steve Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> What is odd about this whole interchange is that I can't quite find the > point of view (all experience is 3rd person) Nick is promoting, but it feels > that it could very well be my own habit of experience and language. What if everything Nick was saying was true (about the absense of true 1st person) , but only for Nick, and other's like him for whom behaviorist ideas make sense? What if, for Nick, there really is no there, there (or a "me" here), but the idea doesn't make sense to others, because there is a "me" there... (I'm sure this idea has been stated before, and it's distracting nonsense, but I don't have much else to contribute, and I didn't think it'd be right to just post, "mumble, mumble" so I could pretend I was participating) ~~James.
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
